wordpress 替换搜索框

6条回复

决定把搜索框替换成google的自定义搜索

找到wp-includes/general-template.php的第160行

$form = ‘<form role=”search” method=”get” id=”searchform” action=”‘ . home_url( ‘/’ ) . ‘” >
<div><label for=”s”>’ . __(‘Search for:’) . ‘</label>
<input type=”text” value=”‘ . get_search_query() . ‘” name=”s” id=”s” />
<input type=”submit” id=”searchsubmit” value=”‘. esc_attr__(‘Search’) .'” />
</div>
</form>’;
替换成google的ADSense代码即可

linux访问mssql server

16条回复

使用freetds可以方便的管理微软的SQLSERVER2000 2005
目前的需求是需要监控一台windowns的数据库,非常不稳定
本来想用php+freetds的,后来发现它本身的bin工具就非常强大了,可以直接执行sql语句
加上简单的脚本就可以很好的完成监控任务

关于somaxconn参数

6条回复

我们线上服务器net.core.somaxconn都是默认的128,这个参数会影响到所有AF_INET类型socket的listen队列

Man 2 listen可以知道:

int listen(int s, int backlog);

The  backlog  parameter  defines the maximum length the queue of pending connections may grow to.  If a connection request

arrives with the queue full the client may receive an error with an indication of ECONNREFUSED or, if the underlying  pro-

tocol supports retransmission, the request may be ignored so that retries succeed.

BUGS

If the socket is of type AF_INET, and the backlog argument is greater than the constant SOMAXCONN  (128  in  Linux  2.0  &

2.2),  it  is silently truncated to SOMAXCONN.

也就是说,web应用中listen函数的backlog会给我们内核参数的net.core.somaxconn 限制到128,在高突发的请求中可能会导致链接超时或者触发重传

比如nginx 定义NGX_LISTEN_BACKLOG默认到511, 却由于我们参数未曾优化会限制到128,只有128个connections can be queued in kernel listen
queue(by Igor Sysoev).

#define NGX_LISTEN_BACKLOG 511/ls.backlog = NGX_LISTEN_BACKLOG;/ if (listen(s, ls.backlog) == -1) {

相信其他应用比如squid也会有类似问题,突发的大并发connect请求会由于内核listen队列的限制导致链接超时或者重传,从而影响用户体验

以下是实验测试情况,使用2台机器分别以1000个并发,benchmark方式,请求服务器 ( 相当于2000个并发请求同时请求服务器 )

情景1,默认配置, net.core.somaxconn=128,服务器为nginx

测试客户端A:

Transactions:                2072870 hits

Availability:                  99.99 %

Elapsed time:                 179.59 secs

Data transferred:            6096.59 MB

Response time:                  0.08 secs

Transaction rate:           11542.24 trans/sec

Throughput:                    33.95 MB/sec

Concurrency:                  927.34

Successful transactions:     2072871

Failed transactions:             300

Longest transaction:           45.30

Shortest transaction:           0.00

错误率大概是1.5%

测试客户端B:

Transactions:                1859454 hits

Availability:                  99.99 %

Elapsed time:                 179.11 secs

Data transferred:            5468.90 MB

Response time:                  0.09 secs

Transaction rate:           10381.63 trans/sec

Throughput:                    30.53 MB/sec

Concurrency:                  904.45

Successful transactions:     1859454

Failed transactions:             276

Longest transaction:           49.60

Shortest transaction:           0.00

错误率大概也是1.5%

错误提示大都为:

socket: connection timed out

warning: socket: -1803417280 select timed out: Connection timed out

情景2,调整配置, net.core.somaxconn=8192,  nginx显式配置  listen     80 default backlog=8192;

测试客户端A:

** SIEGE 2.69

** Preparing 1000 concurrent users for battle.

The server is now under siege…

Lifting the server siege…      done.

Transactions:                1789818 hits

Availability:                 100.00 %

Elapsed time:                 180.00 secs

Data transferred:            5264.09 MB

Response time:                  0.10 secs

Transaction rate:            9943.43 trans/sec

Throughput:                    29.24 MB/sec

Concurrency:                  997.06

Successful transactions:     1789818

Failed transactions:               0

Longest transaction:            0.87

Shortest transaction:           0.00

错误率是0

测试客户端B:

** SIEGE 2.69

** Preparing 1000 concurrent users for battle.

The server is now under siege…

Lifting the server siege…      done.

Transactions:                1768585 hits

Availability:                 100.00 %

Elapsed time:                 179.31 secs

Data transferred:            5201.65 MB

Response time:                  0.10 secs

Transaction rate:            9863.28 trans/sec

Throughput:                    29.01 MB/sec

Concurrency:                  998.30

Successful transactions:     1768588

Failed transactions:               0

Longest transaction:            3.10

Shortest transaction:           0.03

错误率是0